<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 658 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197643</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the respondent, a Law Officer-cum-Draftsman, was entitled to two higher grades after 12 and 24 years of service despite the absence of existing promotional avenues. The Court emphasized the State&#039;s duty to provide opportunities for career advancement and criticized the State of Tripura for not implementing promotion schemes. The Court upheld the High Court&#039;s direction for two promotions based on service duration, highlighting the importance of ensuring promotional avenues and career progression. The appeal was disposed of with specific directions granting the respondent the entitled promotions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 658 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197643</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the respondent, a Law Officer-cum-Draftsman, was entitled to two higher grades after 12 and 24 years of service despite the absence of existing promotional avenues. The Court emphasized the State&#039;s duty to provide opportunities for career advancement and criticized the State of Tripura for not implementing promotion schemes. The Court upheld the High Court&#039;s direction for two promotions based on service duration, highlighting the importance of ensuring promotional avenues and career progression. The appeal was disposed of with specific directions granting the respondent the entitled promotions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>