<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 778 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197640</link>
    <description>After the appellant deposited the development charges demanded by Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation, the matter required consequential relief because the deposit had been accepted. The High Court directed issuance of the No Objection Certificate, set aside the order dated 13.02.2013, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration so that the effect of the deposit could be examined in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:12:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 778 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197640</link>
      <description>After the appellant deposited the development charges demanded by Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation, the matter required consequential relief because the deposit had been accepted. The High Court directed issuance of the No Objection Certificate, set aside the order dated 13.02.2013, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration so that the effect of the deposit could be examined in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>