<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (1) TMI 243 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197632</link>
    <description>Section 84 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 was treated as a temporary arrangement aimed at completing service integration, so the word &quot;mainly&quot; indicated a general preference for deputation rather than an absolute bar on direct recruitment. In the absence of binding recruitment rules, the Chandigarh Administration could prescribe the mode of recruitment and fill the post through direct recruitment via the Union Public Service Commission. The Commission could also relax advertised qualifications where the requisition and notice allowed it, and the selected candidate was found eligible on the stated alternatives. Allegations of bias, mala fides, or denial of equal opportunity were not established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:28:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (1) TMI 243 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197632</link>
      <description>Section 84 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 was treated as a temporary arrangement aimed at completing service integration, so the word &quot;mainly&quot; indicated a general preference for deputation rather than an absolute bar on direct recruitment. In the absence of binding recruitment rules, the Chandigarh Administration could prescribe the mode of recruitment and fill the post through direct recruitment via the Union Public Service Commission. The Commission could also relax advertised qualifications where the requisition and notice allowed it, and the selected candidate was found eligible on the stated alternatives. Allegations of bias, mala fides, or denial of equal opportunity were not established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>