https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197629 After a section 6 declaration and service of section 9 notice under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, land could be withdrawn only through the statutory procedure and by the competent authority; alleged oral assurances, implied agreements, or executive instructions could not override that mechanism. The Court also treated the relied-on policy on houses within or contiguous to municipal limits as only an executive guideline with no legal force to defeat a lawful acquisition, and found the factual preconditions unmet. Claims of discrimination and objection to separate awards also failed because the other exclusions were either legally justified or unsupported, and separate declarations and awards were permissible. en-us Tue, 28 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:10:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197629 After a section 6 declaration and service of section 9 notice under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, land could be withdrawn only through the statutory procedure and by the competent authority; alleged oral assurances, implied agreements, or executive instructions could not override that mechanism. The Court also treated the relied-on policy on houses within or contiguous to municipal limits as only an executive guideline with no legal force to defeat a lawful acquisition, and found the factual preconditions unmet. Claims of discrimination and objection to separate awards also failed because the other exclusions were either legally justified or unsupported, and separate declarations and awards were permissible. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197629