<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 879 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197628</link>
    <description>The appellate court ruled that &quot;Letters of Administration&quot; were not necessary for claiming gold ornaments, directing the Bank to return the ornaments without this requirement. The court also found that actual payment was required for redemption of pledged property to stop interest accrual, limiting the liability for interest payment until August 1982. Concerns about witness examination were raised, but the court upheld the appellate court&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the respondents and dismissing the appeal with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:02:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 879 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197628</link>
      <description>The appellate court ruled that &quot;Letters of Administration&quot; were not necessary for claiming gold ornaments, directing the Bank to return the ornaments without this requirement. The court also found that actual payment was required for redemption of pledged property to stop interest accrual, limiting the liability for interest payment until August 1982. Concerns about witness examination were raised, but the court upheld the appellate court&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the respondents and dismissing the appeal with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>