<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (9) TMI 127 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197627</link>
    <description>A challenge to land acquisition notifications and proceedings must be brought within a reasonable time, because inordinate delay and laches bar relief where the acquisition has substantially progressed on the basis of the notifications and declarations. Here, the acquisition had commenced under Sections 4 and 6, notices were issued under Section 9, and the objection was raised nearly nine years after the declaration under Section 6. The text states that a party cannot allow the process to advance and later attack matters that were open to challenge earlier. The challenge was therefore rejected and the acquisition proceedings were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:56:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (9) TMI 127 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197627</link>
      <description>A challenge to land acquisition notifications and proceedings must be brought within a reasonable time, because inordinate delay and laches bar relief where the acquisition has substantially progressed on the basis of the notifications and declarations. Here, the acquisition had commenced under Sections 4 and 6, notices were issued under Section 9, and the objection was raised nearly nine years after the declaration under Section 6. The text states that a party cannot allow the process to advance and later attack matters that were open to challenge earlier. The challenge was therefore rejected and the acquisition proceedings were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>