<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 477 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197624</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC ruled in favor of the defendants, allowing them to defend the suit as the loan transaction was not considered money lending. The defendants were granted unconditional leave to defend, with a deadline of four weeks to file their written statement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:53:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 477 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197624</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC ruled in favor of the defendants, allowing them to defend the suit as the loan transaction was not considered money lending. The defendants were granted unconditional leave to defend, with a deadline of four weeks to file their written statement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>