https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353757 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appeal and disposing of the cross objection. The commission received for procuring orders and direct supplies did not fall under clearing and forwarding agent services, as per agreements and detailed findings supporting the respondent's position. The issue of service tax liability on commission for negotiating purchases and sales was clarified, affirming that the respondent's activities did not qualify as clearing and forwarding services. The decision aligned with judicial pronouncements, affirming the correctness and legality of the impugned order. en-us Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353757 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appeal and disposing of the cross objection. The commission received for procuring orders and direct supplies did not fall under clearing and forwarding agent services, as per agreements and detailed findings supporting the respondent's position. The issue of service tax liability on commission for negotiating purchases and sales was clarified, affirming that the respondent's activities did not qualify as clearing and forwarding services. The decision aligned with judicial pronouncements, affirming the correctness and legality of the impugned order. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353757