https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353755 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned Order-in-Original dated 31/03/2017. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on inputs, and the demands for short-paid Service Tax and excess collection were unsustainable. The Tribunal did not address the issues of limitation and quantification, leaving them open. The appeal was disposed of with consequential relief to the appellants. en-us Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353755 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned Order-in-Original dated 31/03/2017. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on inputs, and the demands for short-paid Service Tax and excess collection were unsustainable. The Tribunal did not address the issues of limitation and quantification, leaving them open. The appeal was disposed of with consequential relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353755