<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 483 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353747</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods and redemption fine, upheld the demand against the main appellant, confirmed penalties on the main appellant, and set aside the penalty on the individual Director. The judgment clarified the legal aspects of availing CENVAT credit without material receipt, liability for penalties, and requirements for confiscation of goods under the Central Excise Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 08:21:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 483 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353747</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods and redemption fine, upheld the demand against the main appellant, confirmed penalties on the main appellant, and set aside the penalty on the individual Director. The judgment clarified the legal aspects of availing CENVAT credit without material receipt, liability for penalties, and requirements for confiscation of goods under the Central Excise Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>