<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 482 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353746</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on the appellant for failing to pay the Cenvat Credit of SAD, considering the absence of malafide intent as they had already paid excess CVD. The excess CVD was to be adjusted against the short payment of SAD, with the matter remanded for reconciliation. The appellant was directed to pay any reconciled demand on account of SAD with interest, or the matter would be closed if no demand was found payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 08:21:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 482 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353746</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on the appellant for failing to pay the Cenvat Credit of SAD, considering the absence of malafide intent as they had already paid excess CVD. The excess CVD was to be adjusted against the short payment of SAD, with the matter remanded for reconciliation. The appellant was directed to pay any reconciled demand on account of SAD with interest, or the matter would be closed if no demand was found payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>