https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353741 The Tribunal set aside the confirmed demands for clandestine removal of goods due to lack of tangible evidence and errors in calculation. The authorities failed to prove the allegations based on assumptions and presumptions, with the appellants presenting arguments regarding industry-specific factors like burning losses and wastages in the plastic industry. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence and proper consideration of practical aspects, ultimately allowing the appeals and providing consequential relief to the appellants. en-us Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jan 2018 07:53:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353741 The Tribunal set aside the confirmed demands for clandestine removal of goods due to lack of tangible evidence and errors in calculation. The authorities failed to prove the allegations based on assumptions and presumptions, with the appellants presenting arguments regarding industry-specific factors like burning losses and wastages in the plastic industry. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence and proper consideration of practical aspects, ultimately allowing the appeals and providing consequential relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353741