https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353735 The penalties imposed on the appellants under Rule 25(1)(d) and Rule 26(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 were set aside, and the appeals were allowed. The Member (Judicial) found that no investigation was conducted against the appellants, and the evidence presented was insufficient to establish charges. The judgment emphasized the importance of proper investigation and evidence before penalizing individuals, highlighting the necessity of due process and a solid basis for holding parties accountable for alleged violations. en-us Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jan 2018 07:50:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353735 The penalties imposed on the appellants under Rule 25(1)(d) and Rule 26(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 were set aside, and the appeals were allowed. The Member (Judicial) found that no investigation was conducted against the appellants, and the evidence presented was insufficient to establish charges. The judgment emphasized the importance of proper investigation and evidence before penalizing individuals, highlighting the necessity of due process and a solid basis for holding parties accountable for alleged violations. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353735