https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353734 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, ruling that the procedural conditions for Cenvat credit were met despite the bill of entry not being in the appellant's name. The appellant was found entitled to the Cenvat benefit for the Central Value Duty amount, as the goods were received and used for manufacturing excisable goods as intended. The Tribunal set aside the order disallowing Cenvat credit and penalties, emphasizing that the goods were utilized appropriately, supporting the appellant's claim for credit. en-us Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Feb 2019 15:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353734 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, ruling that the procedural conditions for Cenvat credit were met despite the bill of entry not being in the appellant's name. The appellant was found entitled to the Cenvat benefit for the Central Value Duty amount, as the goods were received and used for manufacturing excisable goods as intended. The Tribunal set aside the order disallowing Cenvat credit and penalties, emphasizing that the goods were utilized appropriately, supporting the appellant's claim for credit. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353734