<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 466 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353730</link>
    <description>Chemical storage tanks fitted with a temperature-control facility were held to fall under Heading 84.19 on examination of Chapter Notes 73 and 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. On that classification, the duty paid on the tanks qualified for Cenvat credit, since the assessee&#039;s assertion that the tanks had the facility was accepted from the existing record. As credit was admissible, the associated penalty could not survive and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 07:48:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 466 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353730</link>
      <description>Chemical storage tanks fitted with a temperature-control facility were held to fall under Heading 84.19 on examination of Chapter Notes 73 and 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. On that classification, the duty paid on the tanks qualified for Cenvat credit, since the assessee&#039;s assertion that the tanks had the facility was accepted from the existing record. As credit was admissible, the associated penalty could not survive and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>