https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353728 The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the respondent's appeal in a case involving discrepancies in the quantity of goods received from a bonded warehouse. Despite the Revenue's arguments regarding duty liability for shortages, the Commissioner's thorough analysis of documentary evidence, such as transport receipts and weighbridge reports, confirmed that the goods cleared matched the quantity received. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the respondent's appeal was upheld, highlighting the importance of documentary evidence in verifying the accuracy of goods received from bonded warehouses. en-us Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jan 2018 07:45:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353728 The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the respondent's appeal in a case involving discrepancies in the quantity of goods received from a bonded warehouse. Despite the Revenue's arguments regarding duty liability for shortages, the Commissioner's thorough analysis of documentary evidence, such as transport receipts and weighbridge reports, confirmed that the goods cleared matched the quantity received. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the respondent's appeal was upheld, highlighting the importance of documentary evidence in verifying the accuracy of goods received from bonded warehouses. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353728