<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 889 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197615</link>
    <description>Where the complainant is also the victim in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act prosecution, the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides a statutory right of appeal against acquittal. In that setting, the same person should not bypass the available statutory appeal and seek special leave under Section 378(4). Section 378(4) remains relevant for complainants who are not victims, so the provision is not redundant. The special leave request was declined and the appellant was directed to pursue the statutory appeal remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 18:26:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 889 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197615</link>
      <description>Where the complainant is also the victim in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act prosecution, the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides a statutory right of appeal against acquittal. In that setting, the same person should not bypass the available statutory appeal and seek special leave under Section 378(4). Section 378(4) remains relevant for complainants who are not victims, so the provision is not redundant. The special leave request was declined and the appellant was directed to pursue the statutory appeal remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>