<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 30 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11380</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the salary amounting to Rs. 29,80,610 was not subject to disallowance under section 37(3A) and 37(3B) as it was part of marketing expenditure shared by the assessee. The court also noted that the issue of withdrawing interest granted under section 244(1A) had been settled by the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in a previous case, and therefore, no substantial question of law remained. No costs were awarded in this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 30 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11380</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the salary amounting to Rs. 29,80,610 was not subject to disallowance under section 37(3A) and 37(3B) as it was part of marketing expenditure shared by the assessee. The court also noted that the issue of withdrawing interest granted under section 244(1A) had been settled by the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in a previous case, and therefore, no substantial question of law remained. No costs were awarded in this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>