<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 788 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197614</link>
    <description>Section 47(1) of the disability law protects an employee who acquires disability during service and remains in employment; it cannot be invoked after a valid termination for prolonged absenteeism. The employee here remained absent for a long period, did not answer the employer&#039;s notices or charge-sheet, failed to produce the required medical certificate, and raised the disability claim only after termination. The belated challenge to the disciplinary action also undermined the Commissioner&#039;s interference. The termination of service was upheld, and the order granting reinstatement, continuity of service, and monetary benefits was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 18:04:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 788 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197614</link>
      <description>Section 47(1) of the disability law protects an employee who acquires disability during service and remains in employment; it cannot be invoked after a valid termination for prolonged absenteeism. The employee here remained absent for a long period, did not answer the employer&#039;s notices or charge-sheet, failed to produce the required medical certificate, and raised the disability claim only after termination. The belated challenge to the disciplinary action also undermined the Commissioner&#039;s interference. The termination of service was upheld, and the order granting reinstatement, continuity of service, and monetary benefits was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>