<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 955 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197611</link>
    <description>An employee who acquired mental disability during service was granted interim protection under Section 47 of the Disabilities Act, with the Court taking a pragmatic view that service continuity should be preserved pending final adjudication. The impugned order was stayed only as to back wages, while reinstatement with regular salary from a specified date was directed. The Court also ordered medical examination to assess suitable duties that could safely be assigned, reflecting the statutory scheme for continued employment through accommodation where possible. The question of the disciplinary authority&#039;s power was left open for final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 17:53:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 955 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197611</link>
      <description>An employee who acquired mental disability during service was granted interim protection under Section 47 of the Disabilities Act, with the Court taking a pragmatic view that service continuity should be preserved pending final adjudication. The impugned order was stayed only as to back wages, while reinstatement with regular salary from a specified date was directed. The Court also ordered medical examination to assess suitable duties that could safely be assigned, reflecting the statutory scheme for continued employment through accommodation where possible. The question of the disciplinary authority&#039;s power was left open for final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>