<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 986 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197610</link>
    <description>An employee claiming protection under Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 was found unable to displace the adverse factual record, because he remained absent from service for a long period, did not respond to the notice or charge-sheet, and failed to produce the material needed to support disability-based protection. On those facts, the court found no basis to interfere with the order passed in favour of the respondent, and the order setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision was upheld. The decision turns on the absence of proof supporting the statutory protection and the resulting failure to show any ground for reinstatement relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 17:43:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 986 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197610</link>
      <description>An employee claiming protection under Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 was found unable to displace the adverse factual record, because he remained absent from service for a long period, did not respond to the notice or charge-sheet, and failed to produce the material needed to support disability-based protection. On those facts, the court found no basis to interfere with the order passed in favour of the respondent, and the order setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision was upheld. The decision turns on the absence of proof supporting the statutory protection and the resulting failure to show any ground for reinstatement relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>