<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 710 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197603</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the review petition was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no merit in the review on the papers and dismissed it. The operative effect is that the earlier appellate decision remained undisturbed, as the Court declined to reopen the matter on review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 17:14:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 710 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197603</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the review petition was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no merit in the review on the papers and dismissed it. The operative effect is that the earlier appellate decision remained undisturbed, as the Court declined to reopen the matter on review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>