<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 57 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11376</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that deposits accepted under various schemes and converted into income were capital receipts, not taxable income under the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized that the deposits themselves were not income but capital receipts, even when administrative charges were deducted. Previous court decisions supported this view, and the Department failed to prove the deposits were taxable. The court also found no issue with the Tribunal&#039;s acceptance of the income revision by the assessee in 1994, concluding that the deposits remained capital receipts and did not transform into revenue receipts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 57 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11376</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that deposits accepted under various schemes and converted into income were capital receipts, not taxable income under the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized that the deposits themselves were not income but capital receipts, even when administrative charges were deducted. Previous court decisions supported this view, and the Department failed to prove the deposits were taxable. The court also found no issue with the Tribunal&#039;s acceptance of the income revision by the assessee in 1994, concluding that the deposits remained capital receipts and did not transform into revenue receipts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>