<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (11) TMI 354 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197602</link>
    <description>A summary suit under Order 37 CPC must rest on a legally enforceable document, and an unstamped writing that attracts stamp duty cannot be acted upon under section 34 of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958; the suit was therefore not maintainable on the defective document. Where the defence raised triable issues on the nature of the transaction, the circumstances of execution, and the enforceability of liability, leave to defend could not be made conditional on deposit of the full claim amount; unconditional leave to defend was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:52:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (11) TMI 354 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197602</link>
      <description>A summary suit under Order 37 CPC must rest on a legally enforceable document, and an unstamped writing that attracts stamp duty cannot be acted upon under section 34 of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958; the suit was therefore not maintainable on the defective document. Where the defence raised triable issues on the nature of the transaction, the circumstances of execution, and the enforceability of liability, leave to defend could not be made conditional on deposit of the full claim amount; unconditional leave to defend was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>