https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197598 The court upheld the respondent's demand for an increased interest rate, emphasizing that the petitioners were aware of and voluntarily agreed to the modified rates. The court rejected claims of coercion or discrimination, highlighting that parties are bound by their agreements. The judgment in the case reinforced the principle of honoring contractual obligations and dismissed the petitions as the petitioners failed to demonstrate any legal grounds for interference. en-us Thu, 02 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:52:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197598 The court upheld the respondent's demand for an increased interest rate, emphasizing that the petitioners were aware of and voluntarily agreed to the modified rates. The court rejected claims of coercion or discrimination, highlighting that parties are bound by their agreements. The judgment in the case reinforced the principle of honoring contractual obligations and dismissed the petitions as the petitioners failed to demonstrate any legal grounds for interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197598