<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 26 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11372</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing a cooperative bank to claim deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act for interest and dividend income from investments in other banking institutions. Citing the precedent set in CIT v. Sri Ram Sahakari Bank Ltd., the court emphasized the commercial nature of banking operations and affirmed that such income qualifies for the deduction. The court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the cooperative bank and denying costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 26 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11372</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing a cooperative bank to claim deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act for interest and dividend income from investments in other banking institutions. Citing the precedent set in CIT v. Sri Ram Sahakari Bank Ltd., the court emphasized the commercial nature of banking operations and affirmed that such income qualifies for the deduction. The court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the cooperative bank and denying costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>