<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 26 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11370</link>
    <description>Rupee-based daily allowance paid in India to a foreign technician was held exempt under section 10(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The issue was treated as a pure question of law already covered by binding Supreme Court precedent, which recognised that such daily allowance falls within the exemption. Applying that authority, the reference was answered in the affirmative and the exemption was confirmed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 26 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11370</link>
      <description>Rupee-based daily allowance paid in India to a foreign technician was held exempt under section 10(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The issue was treated as a pure question of law already covered by binding Supreme Court precedent, which recognised that such daily allowance falls within the exemption. Applying that authority, the reference was answered in the affirmative and the exemption was confirmed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>