https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197578 Amendments to a company petition should be allowed liberally when they are needed to place subsequent events on record, do not change the nature of the original claim, and do not introduce a barred or previously decided issue. The court found no material prejudice to the respondents and held that delay alone did not justify partial refusal of the remaining amendments. The reason for disallowing part of the amendment application was therefore unsustainable, and the amendment order in favour of the petitioners was restored. en-us Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:45:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197578 Amendments to a company petition should be allowed liberally when they are needed to place subsequent events on record, do not change the nature of the original claim, and do not introduce a barred or previously decided issue. The court found no material prejudice to the respondents and held that delay alone did not justify partial refusal of the remaining amendments. The reason for disallowing part of the amendment application was therefore unsustainable, and the amendment order in favour of the petitioners was restored. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197578