https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197576 Availability of a statutory remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act does not, by itself, bar writ jurisdiction where the secured creditor's action is said to be without jurisdiction and no real disputed facts are shown. The article also states that disposal of the borrower's representation under Section 13(3A) is a condition precedent to measures under Section 13(4); possession steps taken before such disposal are jurisdictionally infirm. On that footing, the possession notice was treated as unsustainable and the creditor was directed to reconsider the representations before proceeding further. en-us Mon, 24 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:19:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197576 Availability of a statutory remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act does not, by itself, bar writ jurisdiction where the secured creditor's action is said to be without jurisdiction and no real disputed facts are shown. The article also states that disposal of the borrower's representation under Section 13(3A) is a condition precedent to measures under Section 13(4); possession steps taken before such disposal are jurisdictionally infirm. On that footing, the possession notice was treated as unsustainable and the creditor was directed to reconsider the representations before proceeding further. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 24 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197576