<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1126 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197576</link>
    <description>Disposal of a borrower&#039;s representation under the SARFAESI Act is a condition precedent to possession measures by a secured creditor. Possession action initiated before the representation is duly considered is jurisdictionally infirm and requires fresh consideration before further enforcement. Availability of a statutory remedy does not invariably bar writ jurisdiction where the challenged action is without jurisdiction, particularly where no genuine disputed factual issues require resolution through the alternative forum. The secured creditor must decide the borrower&#039;s representation in accordance with law before taking further coercive measures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:19:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1126 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197576</link>
      <description>Disposal of a borrower&#039;s representation under the SARFAESI Act is a condition precedent to possession measures by a secured creditor. Possession action initiated before the representation is duly considered is jurisdictionally infirm and requires fresh consideration before further enforcement. Availability of a statutory remedy does not invariably bar writ jurisdiction where the challenged action is without jurisdiction, particularly where no genuine disputed factual issues require resolution through the alternative forum. The secured creditor must decide the borrower&#039;s representation in accordance with law before taking further coercive measures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>