https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197572 The High Court found the Respondent failed to comply with court orders by not filing a reply in a contempt petition. Despite requests for more time and offering security, the Respondent's counsel could not confirm the status of assets offered as security for the outstanding debt. The Court noted the Respondent's failure to seek clarification or modification of previous orders, leading to a decision not to grant further indulgence. The Respondent was directed to pay costs to the Petitioner and the Managing Director was instructed to appear in court. The case was scheduled for the next hearing on 22nd April 2013. en-us Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:25:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197572 The High Court found the Respondent failed to comply with court orders by not filing a reply in a contempt petition. Despite requests for more time and offering security, the Respondent's counsel could not confirm the status of assets offered as security for the outstanding debt. The Court noted the Respondent's failure to seek clarification or modification of previous orders, leading to a decision not to grant further indulgence. The Respondent was directed to pay costs to the Petitioner and the Managing Director was instructed to appear in court. The case was scheduled for the next hearing on 22nd April 2013. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197572