<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1236 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197568</link>
    <description>The Court proposed a new repayment plan for a loan agreement dispute, recommending full payment within 10 months with interest. Parties were given time to consider the proposal, with a deadline set for replies. If the plan is not accepted, arguments will proceed, and further action is scheduled for a specific date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:27:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1236 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197568</link>
      <description>The Court proposed a new repayment plan for a loan agreement dispute, recommending full payment within 10 months with interest. Parties were given time to consider the proposal, with a deadline set for replies. If the plan is not accepted, arguments will proceed, and further action is scheduled for a specific date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>