https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197567 The appellant was restrained from accessing the securities market for 18 months by SEBI for engaging in synchronized trades, creating artificial volumes. The Tribunal found appellant's trades demonstrated involvement in manipulative practices, dismissing claims of insignificance. Citing precedents, the Tribunal held self trades as illegal. Despite reducing the restraint period to three months due to lesser contribution to artificial volumes, the appeal was partly allowed with no costs awarded. en-us Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197567 The appellant was restrained from accessing the securities market for 18 months by SEBI for engaging in synchronized trades, creating artificial volumes. The Tribunal found appellant's trades demonstrated involvement in manipulative practices, dismissing claims of insignificance. Citing precedents, the Tribunal held self trades as illegal. Despite reducing the restraint period to three months due to lesser contribution to artificial volumes, the appeal was partly allowed with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197567