<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 732 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197566</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the appellant for market manipulation, finding sufficient evidence to support the violation of FUTP Regulations. The delay in proceedings did not prejudice the appellant, and compliance with procedural rules was deemed satisfactory. The appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:00:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 732 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197566</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the appellant for market manipulation, finding sufficient evidence to support the violation of FUTP Regulations. The delay in proceedings did not prejudice the appellant, and compliance with procedural rules was deemed satisfactory. The appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>