<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 16 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11365</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision canceling the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for lack of concealment. The Court emphasized that the Tribunal failed to consider the Explanation to section 271(1)(c) and instructed a re-examination of the matter, directing the Tribunal to consider the Explanation and relevant legal principles. The case was remitted for fresh disposal with instructions to afford both parties the opportunity to present relevant decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 16 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11365</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision canceling the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for lack of concealment. The Court emphasized that the Tribunal failed to consider the Explanation to section 271(1)(c) and instructed a re-examination of the matter, directing the Tribunal to consider the Explanation and relevant legal principles. The case was remitted for fresh disposal with instructions to afford both parties the opportunity to present relevant decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>