https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353701 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the CHA license, allowing the appeal of the appellant. The revocation was deemed disproportionate as the appellant was found not to have knowledge or involvement in the fraudulent activities conducted by an employee. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of collusion between the appellant and the fraudulent exporters, emphasizing the excessive delay in the proceedings and the absence of prior violations by the appellant. Various case laws were cited to support the decision, ultimately concluding that the revocation was unjustified in this case. en-us Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353701 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the CHA license, allowing the appeal of the appellant. The revocation was deemed disproportionate as the appellant was found not to have knowledge or involvement in the fraudulent activities conducted by an employee. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of collusion between the appellant and the fraudulent exporters, emphasizing the excessive delay in the proceedings and the absence of prior violations by the appellant. Various case laws were cited to support the decision, ultimately concluding that the revocation was unjustified in this case. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353701