<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 435 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353699</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the prohibition order preventing the appellant from operating as a customs broker at Delhi Customs Stations. The decision emphasized the necessity of providing the appellant with specific details of alleged violations to ensure a fair hearing and defense, citing a violation of natural justice principles due to the lack of crucial information disclosed during the post decisional hearing. The Commissioner&#039;s decision, based on information from DRI regarding the appellant&#039;s involvement with non-existent export firms, was deemed unfair as the appellant was not informed of the firms under investigation, impeding their ability to respond effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 435 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353699</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the prohibition order preventing the appellant from operating as a customs broker at Delhi Customs Stations. The decision emphasized the necessity of providing the appellant with specific details of alleged violations to ensure a fair hearing and defense, citing a violation of natural justice principles due to the lack of crucial information disclosed during the post decisional hearing. The Commissioner&#039;s decision, based on information from DRI regarding the appellant&#039;s involvement with non-existent export firms, was deemed unfair as the appellant was not informed of the firms under investigation, impeding their ability to respond effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>