<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 432 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353696</link>
    <description>A company struck off from the register under the Companies Act, 2013 may be restored where it shows it was carrying on business, had turnover and profits, and the filing default was inadvertent rather than deliberate. The Tribunal treated the Registrar&#039;s strike-off power as subject to statutory safeguards of notice, opportunity to respond, and satisfaction about liabilities and obligations. On the facts, the application was within time, the company undertook to file pending statutory documents and pay the prescribed fees and costs, and sufficient cause for restoration was established, so the company&#039;s name was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:34:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 432 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353696</link>
      <description>A company struck off from the register under the Companies Act, 2013 may be restored where it shows it was carrying on business, had turnover and profits, and the filing default was inadvertent rather than deliberate. The Tribunal treated the Registrar&#039;s strike-off power as subject to statutory safeguards of notice, opportunity to respond, and satisfaction about liabilities and obligations. On the facts, the application was within time, the company undertook to file pending statutory documents and pay the prescribed fees and costs, and sufficient cause for restoration was established, so the company&#039;s name was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>