https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353695 Belated impleadment and amendment applications in a long-pending company petition were declined because the proposed parties and relevant developments had been available for a long time, yet no timely steps were taken. The Tribunal treated the extraordinary delay as decisive, held that the applications lacked valid justification at that stage, and noted that interlocutory proceedings could not be used to obtain declaratory relief. It further observed that repeated interlocutory filings amounted to an abuse of process. On that basis, the refusal to allow impleadment and amendment was upheld and the appeal was not admitted. en-us Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:33:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353695 Belated impleadment and amendment applications in a long-pending company petition were declined because the proposed parties and relevant developments had been available for a long time, yet no timely steps were taken. The Tribunal treated the extraordinary delay as decisive, held that the applications lacked valid justification at that stage, and noted that interlocutory proceedings could not be used to obtain declaratory relief. It further observed that repeated interlocutory filings amounted to an abuse of process. On that basis, the refusal to allow impleadment and amendment was upheld and the appeal was not admitted. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353695