<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 508 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197553</link>
    <description>Deliberate use of the mark HERO HONDA, including the logo and deceptively similar packaging for motorcycle parts, was treated as trademark infringement and passing off because the evidence showed copying calculated to mislead purchasers and exploit the plaintiff&#039;s goodwill. The plaintiff&#039;s long use, registration of the mark and stylised logo, and rights in the artistic works supported permanent injunctive relief. The seized infringing goods were held liable to destruction, and damages were awarded despite the absence of exact loss proof because counterfeiting cases may justify compensatory and punitive damages. Costs were also granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 18:36:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 508 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197553</link>
      <description>Deliberate use of the mark HERO HONDA, including the logo and deceptively similar packaging for motorcycle parts, was treated as trademark infringement and passing off because the evidence showed copying calculated to mislead purchasers and exploit the plaintiff&#039;s goodwill. The plaintiff&#039;s long use, registration of the mark and stylised logo, and rights in the artistic works supported permanent injunctive relief. The seized infringing goods were held liable to destruction, and damages were awarded despite the absence of exact loss proof because counterfeiting cases may justify compensatory and punitive damages. Costs were also granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>