https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197550 A non-speaking arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, 1940 could be challenged only on the limited grounds in Section 30, and courts could not infer reasons or reappreciate valuation and partition choices to find an error apparent on the face of the award. Allegations that the arbitrator had incorrectly recorded a party's presence or returned documents did not, on the facts stated, establish misconduct. An amendment to an objection petition introducing these fresh allegations was not maintainable because it added new grounds of challenge rather than particulars of an existing plea, and limitation had already run. The award was therefore restored as the rule of court. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Apr 2018 15:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197550 A non-speaking arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, 1940 could be challenged only on the limited grounds in Section 30, and courts could not infer reasons or reappreciate valuation and partition choices to find an error apparent on the face of the award. Allegations that the arbitrator had incorrectly recorded a party's presence or returned documents did not, on the facts stated, establish misconduct. An amendment to an objection petition introducing these fresh allegations was not maintainable because it added new grounds of challenge rather than particulars of an existing plea, and limitation had already run. The award was therefore restored as the rule of court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197550