https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197548 The judgment addressed the delay in initiating proceedings under the SEBI Act, 1992, due to the inordinate time gap between the manipulation of scrips and the final order debarring the appellants. Despite finding manipulation in six companies, the appellants were only warned due to the delay and case merits. The case emphasized the importance of consistent handling of such matters to avoid discrepancies in penalties. Inconsistencies in orders by different authorities for similar manipulations underscored the need for uniformity in decision-making to ensure fairness in regulatory actions. en-us Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jan 2018 17:56:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197548 The judgment addressed the delay in initiating proceedings under the SEBI Act, 1992, due to the inordinate time gap between the manipulation of scrips and the final order debarring the appellants. Despite finding manipulation in six companies, the appellants were only warned due to the delay and case merits. The case emphasized the importance of consistent handling of such matters to avoid discrepancies in penalties. Inconsistencies in orders by different authorities for similar manipulations underscored the need for uniformity in decision-making to ensure fairness in regulatory actions. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197548