<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 12 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11359</link>
    <description>Wooden shells and crates/bottles used in bottling operations were treated as plant for depreciation purposes under the Income-tax Act, rather than as mere stock-in-trade packing materials. The reasoning of an earlier High Court decision on the same issue was followed, and the Tribunal&#039;s view was upheld as correct. On that basis, no referable question of law was found to arise, and the reference application under section 256(2) was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 12 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11359</link>
      <description>Wooden shells and crates/bottles used in bottling operations were treated as plant for depreciation purposes under the Income-tax Act, rather than as mere stock-in-trade packing materials. The reasoning of an earlier High Court decision on the same issue was followed, and the Tribunal&#039;s view was upheld as correct. On that basis, no referable question of law was found to arise, and the reference application under section 256(2) was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>