<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 874 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197542</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) confirming additions in the fresh assessments and dismissed appeals against orders setting aside original assessments as infructuous. The Tribunal directed deletion of additions by the Assessing Officer, concluding the assessee proved agricultural income and expenses, while the Officer failed to comply with CIT(A)&#039;s directions and disprove the evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 16:54:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 874 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197542</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) confirming additions in the fresh assessments and dismissed appeals against orders setting aside original assessments as infructuous. The Tribunal directed deletion of additions by the Assessing Officer, concluding the assessee proved agricultural income and expenses, while the Officer failed to comply with CIT(A)&#039;s directions and disprove the evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>