<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 46 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11357</link>
    <description>The court found the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s exemption application under section 80G to be unsustainable, especially when compared to the exemption granted to a similar charitable trust. The court emphasized the need for consistent application of norms and parameters for granting exemptions to trusts with similar objectives, ultimately allowing the writ petition in part and setting aside the original rejection order for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 46 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11357</link>
      <description>The court found the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s exemption application under section 80G to be unsustainable, especially when compared to the exemption granted to a similar charitable trust. The court emphasized the need for consistent application of norms and parameters for granting exemptions to trusts with similar objectives, ultimately allowing the writ petition in part and setting aside the original rejection order for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>