https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197538 An arbitral award will not be set aside where the objections disclose neither misconduct by the arbitrator nor an error of law apparent on the face of the award. The award was sustained because the arbitrator's reasoning supported forfeiture of the security deposit, treated the later risk purchase as vitiated by inordinate delay and want of notice to the original contractor, and found that actual loss or general damages had not been proved. The challenge to the rejection of the claim for the differential amount did not furnish a valid basis for interference, so the objections were rejected and the award was affirmed. en-us Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jan 2018 16:04:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197538 An arbitral award will not be set aside where the objections disclose neither misconduct by the arbitrator nor an error of law apparent on the face of the award. The award was sustained because the arbitrator's reasoning supported forfeiture of the security deposit, treated the later risk purchase as vitiated by inordinate delay and want of notice to the original contractor, and found that actual loss or general damages had not been proved. The challenge to the rejection of the claim for the differential amount did not furnish a valid basis for interference, so the objections were rejected and the award was affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197538