https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197537 The scope of judicial interference with an arbitral award is limited, and a court cannot reappreciate facts, evidence, or contractual interpretation merely because another view is possible. Brevity of reasons, by itself, does not invalidate an award, and even a non-speaking award may be sustained in appropriate circumstances. Where the arbitrator is shown to have heard both sides, examined the record, and rejected the claim on the basis of deviation in the risk purchase contract, a challenge that effectively seeks factual reappraisal is impermissible. The objection to set aside the award was therefore rejected and the award was upheld. en-us Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jan 2018 15:57:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197537 The scope of judicial interference with an arbitral award is limited, and a court cannot reappreciate facts, evidence, or contractual interpretation merely because another view is possible. Brevity of reasons, by itself, does not invalidate an award, and even a non-speaking award may be sustained in appropriate circumstances. Where the arbitrator is shown to have heard both sides, examined the record, and rejected the claim on the basis of deviation in the risk purchase contract, a challenge that effectively seeks factual reappraisal is impermissible. The objection to set aside the award was therefore rejected and the award was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197537