https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197526 The Court ruled in favor of the Plaintiff regarding the payment for the liquor shop license fee. Defendant No. 1 failed to prove he had paid the required amount, and the Plaintiff provided evidence of payment. The Court found Defendant No. 1's claim for the February kist time-barred but allowed the claim for March kist. Additionally, Defendant No. 1 was decreed to pay the Plaintiff the specified amount for the articles taken in a separate suit. The parties were directed to share costs based on the success of their claims. en-us Wed, 29 Apr 1925 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jun 2026 13:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197526 The Court ruled in favor of the Plaintiff regarding the payment for the liquor shop license fee. Defendant No. 1 failed to prove he had paid the required amount, and the Plaintiff provided evidence of payment. The Court found Defendant No. 1's claim for the February kist time-barred but allowed the claim for March kist. Additionally, Defendant No. 1 was decreed to pay the Plaintiff the specified amount for the articles taken in a separate suit. The parties were directed to share costs based on the success of their claims. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Apr 1925 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197526