https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197526 Payment of liquor-shop licence instalments required proof beyond account-book entries. The analysis records that a treasury receipt supported the plaintiff's payment of the January instalment, while the opposing party's uncorroborated testimony and books did not establish that he made that payment; recovery was therefore supported in the plaintiff's favour. A counterclaim for February and March instalments was assessed under limitation: the February claim was time-barred and could not operate as an equitable set-off, whereas the March claim remained timely. The undisputed price of articles taken was recoverable by the plaintiff, with costs apportioned according to success on the respective claims. en-us Wed, 29 Apr 1925 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jun 2026 13:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197526 Payment of liquor-shop licence instalments required proof beyond account-book entries. The analysis records that a treasury receipt supported the plaintiff's payment of the January instalment, while the opposing party's uncorroborated testimony and books did not establish that he made that payment; recovery was therefore supported in the plaintiff's favour. A counterclaim for February and March instalments was assessed under limitation: the February claim was time-barred and could not operate as an equitable set-off, whereas the March claim remained timely. The undisputed price of articles taken was recoverable by the plaintiff, with costs apportioned according to success on the respective claims. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Apr 1925 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197526