https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197515 Sections 91 and 92 of the Indian Evidence Act bar oral evidence that would contradict or vary the terms of a written sale deed. The consideration recited in the conveyance is part of the contractual terms, and the provisos to Section 92 do not allow a party, absent any plea of invalidity, silence on consideration, or failure of consideration, to prove a different amount by oral testimony. The distinction between the kind of consideration and its quantum supports the same result. A party to the deed cannot therefore claim that the real sale consideration was higher or lower than the figure stated in the document. en-us Wed, 18 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jan 2018 12:27:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197515 Sections 91 and 92 of the Indian Evidence Act bar oral evidence that would contradict or vary the terms of a written sale deed. The consideration recited in the conveyance is part of the contractual terms, and the provisos to Section 92 do not allow a party, absent any plea of invalidity, silence on consideration, or failure of consideration, to prove a different amount by oral testimony. The distinction between the kind of consideration and its quantum supports the same result. A party to the deed cannot therefore claim that the real sale consideration was higher or lower than the figure stated in the document. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197515