<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1931 (2) TMI 9 - HIGH COURT OTHER</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197508</link>
    <description>Specific performance cannot be supported by an unregistered sale deed or by an earlier oral agreement where the contractual terms are required to be proved from the written instrument itself. An unregistered deed cannot be relied on as evidence of a transaction affecting immovable property, and presentation for registration must comply strictly with the statutory requirement that the document be presented by the proper person. Where the written sale deeds supersede any prior oral arrangement, the evidence rule bars proof of the transaction by extrinsic evidence. In the absence of admissible proof of the agreement, the claim for specific performance fails.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 1931 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 12:09:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1931 (2) TMI 9 - HIGH COURT OTHER</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197508</link>
      <description>Specific performance cannot be supported by an unregistered sale deed or by an earlier oral agreement where the contractual terms are required to be proved from the written instrument itself. An unregistered deed cannot be relied on as evidence of a transaction affecting immovable property, and presentation for registration must comply strictly with the statutory requirement that the document be presented by the proper person. Where the written sale deeds supersede any prior oral arrangement, the evidence rule bars proof of the transaction by extrinsic evidence. In the absence of admissible proof of the agreement, the claim for specific performance fails.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 1931 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>