https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197507 An objection under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC was held maintainable after a court auction but before confirmation of sale, because "sold" in the proviso means a completed sale, not merely an auction. The Court held that until confirmation under Order XXI Rule 92, the auction-purchaser's rights remain incomplete and the executing court may still adjudicate the claim. It further held that Section 65 CPC does not override prior contractual rights affecting the property. An agreement-holder with a pre-existing interest was therefore not a stranger and had locus standi to resist execution sale. The executing court was required to decide the objections on merits. en-us Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jan 2018 12:01:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197507 An objection under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC was held maintainable after a court auction but before confirmation of sale, because "sold" in the proviso means a completed sale, not merely an auction. The Court held that until confirmation under Order XXI Rule 92, the auction-purchaser's rights remain incomplete and the executing court may still adjudicate the claim. It further held that Section 65 CPC does not override prior contractual rights affecting the property. An agreement-holder with a pre-existing interest was therefore not a stranger and had locus standi to resist execution sale. The executing court was required to decide the objections on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197507